there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
as in
division of reality is straying away from it
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i really havent
feel you
yeah
i was tempted to lie about my name
so at the end
abrar?
plato
i understand
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
so the method has to be autonomous
like first name
...
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
was it worth it
the site i am dreaming
bro i read nothing in my life
is everyoneback on tumblr now
Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl
I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.
Windrush Art Kid Oligarch