what do you think my name is
yeah
you cannot feed someone truth
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
so at the end
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
autonomy of learning
send your tumblr
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
as in
lol
division of reality is straying away from it
magnetisation/form
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
much more tactility
we can only engage in such a way
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
all that is to say
so an active mazelike process
i dont understand magnetisation
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i love it here
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
plato
what do you mean
god being the centre magnet
which magnetises chains of pins
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
i really havent
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class