way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

yeah

fw

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

as in

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it

its good

i really havent

plato

we need to be deconstructing our identities

you cannot feed someone truth

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

so the method has to be autonomous

its good short few pages

hiding from the rain

I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.

It Will Get Lighter

all that is to say

its good

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

no longer writing in the third person

Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl

have you read

Windrush Art Kid Oligarch

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

and the fake qualifier

so an active mazelike process

The bird dives back into the tree. It shakes, some leaves fall.

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine