ahnaf abrar
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
its performative
bro i read nothing in my life
whats your name?
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
isaac newton
what do you mean
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i really havent
so an active mazelike process
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
feel you
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
all that is to say
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
division of reality is straying away from it
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
god being the centre magnet
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
is this you as well
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls