like first name

bro i read nothing in my life

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

its performative

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

isaac

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

and the fake qualifier

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

we can only engage in such a way

have you read

plato

as in

whats your name?

ion

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

abrar?

not their contents

thank you

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

so at the end

so the method has to be autonomous

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

plato

magnetisation/form

propensity within someone

i was tempted to lie about my name

its good

a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it

like magnets

much more tactility

that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.