there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
autonomy of learning
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
that looks like my instagram account
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
not their contents
much more tactility
so at the end
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
so the method has to be autonomous
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
the site i am dreaming
idk
send link
propensity within someone
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:38:15
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
yeah