so at the end
we can only engage in such a way
not their contents
so the method has to be autonomous
its performative
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
magnetisation/form
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
as in
...
no longer writing in the third person
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
idk
much more tactility
They're fucking around with the box. I ask her what people do with fireworks for so long before they're ready to light. She doesn't know.
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
you cannot feed someone truth