stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.lol yea
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
so at the end
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
not their contents
plato
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
god being the centre magnet
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
have you read
we can only engage in such a way
and the fake qualifier
like first name
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
abrar?
so an active mazelike process
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
barren land
i want to do that too
sorry i am texting like a slav
no like which do people call me
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.
I created this site
.