think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
so at the end
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
division of reality is straying away from it
as in
its performative
propensity within someone
that looks like my instagram account
so the method has to be autonomous
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
all that is to say
you cannot feed someone truth
its good
fw
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
is everyoneback on tumblr now
send your tumblr
sorry i am texting like a slav
theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine
plato
is this you as well
really i want the internet
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
currently
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46