I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
division of reality is straying away from it
abrar?
not their contents
we can only engage in such a way
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
propensity within someone
bro i read nothing in my life
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
its performative
its good
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
was it worth it
i really havent
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
i was tempted to lie about my name
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
lol yea
no i haven't really read anything
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
or never left
i understand
fw
plato
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time