there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i love it here
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
magnetises a pin
all that is to say
what do you mean
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
plato
isaac
whats your name?
god being the centre magnet
magnetisation/form
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
...
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
feel you
i really havent
hello reader,