much more tactility

propensity within someone

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

so an active mazelike process

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

lol

is everyoneback on tumblr now

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

barren land

not their contents

idk

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

wait what is that

the site i am dreaming

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

and the fake qualifier

i really havent

fw

its performative

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

autonomy of learning

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

lol yea

was it worth it

...

confused - is it the tide or its absense? I still like where I was going with it. anyway, real reader know this site is the note.

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

as in

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

magnetisation/form

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.