fw

not their contents

i want to do that too

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

i have read not even 1 book

send your tumblr

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

what do you mean

yeah

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

so an active mazelike process

i really havent

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

abrar?

god being the centre magnet

idk

no like which do people call me

plato

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

ahnaf abrar

1

no longer writing in the third person

ion

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

Better Lift

division of reality is straying away from it

Style

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

plato