the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
send your tumblr
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
so the method has to be autonomous
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged
but i respect your search
theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine
i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
propensity within someone
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
wait what is that
autonomy of learning
send link
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
bro i read nothing in my life