no like which do people call me
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i understand
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i dont understand magnetisation