there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
The Hatton geezer (fuck off) is emptying his pockets, searching for the silver rizlas he apparently has. He refuses to take one of mine (also silver) because the tobacco I'm giving him is already too much to ask. He tells me about the guy who can do 50g of Golden Virginia for a good price, the guy who every other man over 50 knows. I'm not interested.
its good
no like which do people call me
no i haven't really read anything
like magnets
sorry i am texting like a slav
was it worth it
i want to do that too
abrar?
magnetisation/form
and the fake qualifier
its good
isaac
something religious, a kind of complex,
it will get lighter
, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc.somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
yeah
i really havent
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
The bird dives back into the tree. It shakes, some leaves fall.
I'm getting bored and he can tell, so he shifts the topic towards me. He tells me he'd spotted me chatting to a girl earlier, a black girl, and asks what I thought of her, if I liked her. I mimed affirmatively.
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
its good short few pages
i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it
much more tactility
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
its performative