i love it here

like first name

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

its good

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

so the method has to be autonomous

plato

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

magnetisation/form

...

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

propensity within someone

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

is this you as well

so an active mazelike process

division of reality is straying away from it

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

as in

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

...

i was tempted to lie about my name

"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"

Style

Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

bro i read nothing in my life