idk
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
isaac
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
bro i read nothing in my life
what do you mean
sorry i am texting like a slav
propensity within someone
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
is everyoneback on tumblr now
i understand
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
...
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its good
no longer writing in the third person
send your tumblr
the site i am dreaming
we can only engage in such a way
something religious, a kind of complex,
it will get lighter
, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc.lol yea