i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
division of reality is straying away from it
...
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
we can only engage in such a way
bro i read nothing in my life
...
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
hello reader,
ahnaf abrar
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
bro i read nothing in my life
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
isaac newton
yeah
not their contents
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
send link
all that is to say
no i haven't really read anything
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
abrar?