kind of mythopoesis

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

propensity within someone

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

its performative

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

magnetisation/form

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i have read not even 1 book

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

autonomy of learning

you cannot feed someone truth

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

much more tactility

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

which magnetises chains of pins

yeah

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

have you read

we can only engage in such a way

what do you think my name is

2 (actually index). two is company

fw

Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation