2 (actually index). two is company

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

its good

is this you as well

yes

i love it here

was it worth it

feel you

Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting


isaac

Thank you, Jack

autonomy of learning

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

propensity within someone


its good

Better Lift

and the fake qualifier

i dont understand magnetisation

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

no like which do people call me

Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03

magnetisation/form

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

One of the birds shoots out of the tree.


mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

It Will Get Lighter

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now