my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

plato

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

lol yea

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i understand

so the method has to be autonomous

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

abrar?

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

its good

its performative

no i haven't really read anything

whats your name?

was it worth it

propensity within someone

you cannot feed someone truth

bro i read nothing in my life

magnetises a pin

no like which do people call me

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

like first name

like magnets

isaac

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

Maybe, Jack, I'm doing this because I'm English?

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!