there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
so the method has to be autonomous
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
as in
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
yeah
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
magnetisation/form
we need to be deconstructing our identities
like first name
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
ahnaf abrar
was it worth it
plato
Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl
feel you
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
barren land
I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:22:59
hiding from the rain