i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
autonomy of learning
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
what do you think my name is
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
what do you mean
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
so the method has to be autonomous
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
have you read
we can only engage in such a way
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
not their contents
its good
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
plato
feel you
Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.
i dont understand magnetisation
We gather around the start of a causeway down to the Thames. It's a pretty cold night and there's a breeze coming off the river.
there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.
Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl