my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
god being the centre magnet
so the method has to be autonomous
magnetisation/form
not their contents
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
we can only engage in such a way
propensity within someone
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
division of reality is straying away from it
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
all that is to say
bro i read nothing in my life
isaac
its good
which magnetises chains of pins
we need to be deconstructing our identities
as in
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
was it worth it
no like which do people call me
plato
and the fake qualifier
autonomy of learning
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
plato
is this you as well
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
like first name
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
i want to do that too
magnetises a pin
Lift Analysis
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
feel you