After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
I am below everything.
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
as in
you cannot feed someone truth
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
all that is to say
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
its performative
propensity within someone
One of the birds shoots out of the tree.
not their contents
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it