abrar?

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

barren land

i love it here

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

division of reality is straying away from it

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

isaac

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

lol yea

we can only engage in such a way

sorry i am texting like a slav

all that is to say

what do you mean

was it worth it

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i want to do that too

so at the end

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

magnetisation/form

have you read

and the fake qualifier

propensity within someone

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

yeah

as in

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

1