Today I felt like starting

yeah

i dont understand magnetisation

lol

like first name

send your tumblr

like magnets

is everyoneback on tumblr now

god being the centre magnet

isaac newton

i love it here

much more tactility

which magnetises chains of pins

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

so the method has to be autonomous

and the fake qualifier

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i understand

propensity within someone

is this you as well

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

i have read not even 1 book

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

all that is to say

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

isaac

feel you

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

not their contents

plato

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

what do you think my name is

i was tempted to lie about my name