the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
much more tactility
so an active mazelike process
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
isaac
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
i was tempted to lie about my name
its good
ahnaf abrar
no i haven't really read anything
was it worth it
its good short few pages
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i dont understand magnetisation
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
we can only engage in such a way
Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
...
bro i read nothing in my life
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i really havent
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
its performative
and the fake qualifier