its good

fw

its performative

so the method has to be autonomous

sorry i am texting like a slav

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

and the fake qualifier

its good

not their contents

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

what do you mean

ion

magnetisation/form

have you read

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

plato

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i really havent

your feed looks like my tumblr

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

abrar?

all that is to say

propensity within someone

so at the end

we can only engage in such a way