fw

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

autonomy of learning

which magnetises chains of pins

like magnets

i dont understand magnetisation

what do you mean

plato

god being the centre magnet

so the method has to be autonomous

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

i understand

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

have you read

its good

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

we can only engage in such a way

its good short few pages

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

ion

isaac newton

its good

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

much more tactility

its performative

all that is to say

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.

it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful