2 (actually index). two is company

god being the centre magnet

so the method has to be autonomous

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

magnetises a pin

what do you mean

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

much more tactility

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

isaac newton

its good

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

like first name

and the fake qualifier

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

so an active mazelike process

which magnetises chains of pins

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

Wed, 11 Nov 2025 21:12:41

i really havent

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️

It's

dusk

in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.
It bites my wrist but there is only a dull ache.
I feel that it wants to say sorry but can't. I die.

Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl

Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.

was it worth it