like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

we can only engage in such a way

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

autonomy of learning

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

you cannot feed someone truth

division of reality is straying away from it

what do you think my name is

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

plato

sorry i am texting like a slav

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

isaac

your feed looks like my tumblr

plato

send your tumblr

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

have you read

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

its performative

its good

no i haven't really read anything

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

no like which do people call me

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

ahnaf abrar

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

i dont understand magnetisation

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

abrar?

magnetisation/form

i was tempted to lie about my name