its good

so the method has to be autonomous

not their contents

as in

magnetisation/form

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

you cannot feed someone truth

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

division of reality is straying away from it

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

have you read

isaac

god being the centre magnet

December 2025

we can only engage in such a way

propensity within someone

the site i am dreaming

thank you

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i really havent

and the fake qualifier

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

idk