i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i understand
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
like first name
lol yea
send your tumblr
was it worth it
bro i read nothing in my life
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
we need to be deconstructing our identities
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
as in
i dont understand magnetisation
we can only engage in such a way
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
its good
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
its good short few pages
yeah
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
no like which do people call me