like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

fw

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

yeah

your feed looks like my tumblr

like first name

not their contents

division of reality is straying away from it

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

so an active mazelike process

i love it here

no i haven't really read anything

and the fake qualifier

barren land

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

...

bro i read nothing in my life

plato

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

yeah