i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

abrar?

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

It Will Get Lighter

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

so an active mazelike process

like first name

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

autonomy of learning

i really havent

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

fw

all that is to say

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

i want to do that too

we need to be deconstructing our identities

we can only engage in such a way

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

or never left

barren land

and the fake qualifier


was it worth it

wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine



the site i am dreaming


i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything