i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
we can only engage in such a way
autonomy of learning
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
so an active mazelike process
all that is to say
hello reader,
...
propensity within someone
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
idk
division of reality is straying away from it
its good
your feed looks like my tumblr
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
isaac
...
plato
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
its good
have you read
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos