i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

idk

autonomy of learning

i understand

so the method has to be autonomous

which magnetises chains of pins

isaac newton

much more tactility

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

its good short few pages

you cannot feed someone truth

lol

fw

your feed looks like my tumblr

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i have read not even 1 book

we can only engage in such a way

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

what do you mean

i dont understand magnetisation

was it worth it

god being the centre magnet