i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

no like which do people call me

idk

not their contents

what do you mean

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

whats your name?

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

no i haven't really read anything

autonomy of learning

we can only engage in such a way

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

so at the end

its good

lol

have you read

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine

it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books