in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

so an active mazelike process

as in

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

we need to be deconstructing our identities

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

what do you think my name is

i was tempted to lie about my name

is this you as well

have you read

not their contents

ahnaf abrar

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

propensity within someone

no like which do people call me

isaac

isaac newton

its good short few pages

i dont understand magnetisation

its good

we can only engage in such a way

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

division of reality is straying away from it

you cannot feed someone truth

thank you

abrar?

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

Rain, starting

Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17

so the method has to be autonomous

yeah


It's

dusk

in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.
It bites my wrist but there is only a dull ache.
I feel that it wants to say sorry but can't. I die.

which magnetises chains of pins

like first name