ion


think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

so at the end

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

all that is to say

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

not their contents

we can only engage in such a way

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

magnetises a pin

no like which do people call me

sorry i am texting like a slav

whats your name?

i really havent

was it worth it

and the fake qualifier

Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

no longer writing in the third person


lol

something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever

Better Lift


there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.