there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

was it worth it

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

so at the end

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

its performative

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

like magnets

feel you

autonomy of learning

that looks like my instagram account

god being the centre magnet

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

isaac

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

lol yea

as in

plato

ahnaf abrar

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i really havent

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

barren land

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

the site i am dreaming

your feed looks like my tumblr