like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

plato

autonomy of learning

its good short few pages

or never left

so at the end

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

propensity within someone

isaac

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

no i haven't really read anything

much more tactility

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.

its good

magnetisation/form

it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful

we can only engage in such a way

ion

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

whats your name?

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

Above and in front two birds are darting in and out of a tree. Sometimes they collide to fight or maybe mate, but I can't really make it out in the low light. It's just after

dusk