but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

send link

i understand

so the method has to be autonomous

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

its performative

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

what do you mean

we can only engage in such a way

thank you

magnetises a pin

have you read

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i love it here

plato

i dont understand magnetisation

so at the end

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

bro i read nothing in my life

"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"

"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."

One of the birds shoots out of the tree.

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

currently

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

Sun, 02 Nov 2025 23:49:08

which magnetises chains of pins

Style