i dont understand magnetisation
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
all that is to say
idk
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
so the method has to be autonomous
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
isaac
is everyoneback on tumblr now
magnetisation/form
was it worth it
sorry i am texting like a slav
we can only engage in such a way
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
its good
ion
its good short few pages
no i haven't really read anything
isaac newton
like magnets
its performative
its good
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
have you read
which magnetises chains of pins
not their contents
i understand
lol yea
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
...