lol yea

But seriously, thank you, Jack

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

was it worth it

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

isaac

yeah

abrar?

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

whats your name?

what do you think my name is

you cannot feed someone truth

its performative

much more tactility

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

plato

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

send your tumblr

magnetisation/form

is this you as well

division of reality is straying away from it

and the fake qualifier

so an active mazelike process

ion

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

plato

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

what do you mean

bro i read nothing in my life

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away