i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

magnetisation/form

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

ahnaf abrar

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

abrar?

so at the end

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

i love it here

what do you think my name is

was it worth it

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

like first name

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

autonomy of learning

have you read

its good

feel you

we need to be deconstructing our identities

much more tactility

ion

isaac newton

and the fake qualifier

bro i read nothing in my life

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

whats your name?

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

and the fake qualifier

god being the centre magnet