i understand
lol
fw
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
division of reality is straying away from it
send your tumblr
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
yeah
was it worth it
yeah
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
its performative
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
what do you mean
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
propensity within someone
so at the end
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
like magnets
ion
much more tactility
ahnaf abrar
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
as in
or never left
and the fake qualifier
i love it here