like first name

not their contents

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

fw

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

much more tactility

that looks like my instagram account

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

what do you mean

no i haven't really read anything

or never left

so an active mazelike process

currently

yes

as in

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

idk

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

bro i read nothing in my life

propensity within someone

"Put a blanket."

She closes the window. I wasn't paying attention anyway, I'm getting cold, and the birds are nowhere to be seen. I go inside.

lol yea

abrar?

Lift Analysis

thank you

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt